Rule No. 6 —Your first idea is rarely your best.

Where in our organization are decisions being made too quickly—built on the first idea that hits the table?

  • When did pressure for speed cause your organization to commit to an idea too quickly? Looking back, what would you have done differently to explore better alternatives?
  • How did a second or third idea end up outperforming your original plan in a major decision, project, or strategy? What changed between the first concept and the final one?
  • In your experience, when has someone on your team challenged your first idea and ultimately improved the outcome? What did that moment teach you about creating space for dissent?
  • When did you move forward with the first idea that seemed right—only to later realize a better option existed? What did that experience teach you about slowing down your decision-making process?
  • How did a process of iteration—prototypes, revisions, or repeated attempts—lead to a breakthrough idea that never would have surfaced if you had stopped at the first solution?

Name
We will never add you to a mailing list, without your direct permission. We will never sell, share, or monetize your information.
Select the Rule that resonates with you:
Prefer to speak instead of type? Record a short video insight (up to 5min.). After pressing record, wait 3–4 seconds before speaking to allow the camera to begin. You’ll be able to preview your video before submitting. A face and voice behind the lesson helps bring the Rule to life for other leaders.
Share your insight, a lesson learned or a turning point in your business or your leadership style.
Describe a situation where this principle helped, failed, or changed the direction of a decision in your business.
What did this experience teach you about leadership, decision-making, or running a business?
Was there a concept, passage, or idea that stuck with you or shaped how you think about this Rule?
If another executive were wrestling with this principle, what would you tell them?
Have an additional insight on this topic? Share any further lessons, observations, or experiences that may help other business leaders think differently about this fundamental business Rule.

Why This Is Rule No. 6?

Because most leadership mistakes don’t come from bad intent—they come from locking in too early. Rule No. 6 is the moment where discipline matters: slowing down just enough to challenge the first answer before it hardens into strategy. Get this wrong, and every rule that follows is built on a weak foundation.

This Rule will help you…

Improve decision quality through iteration

Avoid premature commitment to untested ideas

Encourage creative thinking within teams

Build a culture of thoughtful innovation

Increase the likelihood of breakthrough solutions

Here are 5 signs you may be ignoring Rule No. 6…

Fast Consensus– Teams quickly agree on the first idea presented, with little debate or exploration of alternatives.

Idea Fatigue – Leaders discourage “too many” suggestions, signaling that efficiency is valued over creativity.

Fear of Rework – Projects push forward even when flaws emerge, because revisiting the concept is seen as wasted effort.

Overconfidence in the Pitch – A strong initial presentation is mistaken for a strong long-term solution, without deeper testing.

Lack of Iteration – Products, strategies, or campaigns are launched without pilots, prototypes, or scenario testing.

WEEK 3 | Ask Yourself

Where in our organization are decisions being made too quickly—built on the first idea that hits the table?

💬 Leadership Team Discussion

This rule invites leaders to step back and ask a question that cuts through complexity. Discuss with your leadership team:

Which recent idea or initiative did we move forward with too quickly—without exploring better alternatives?
(What might have improved with more iteration or input?)

How does our team create space for second, third, or even tenth ideas—rather than just rallying around the first one that sounds good?
(Do we reward speed or thoughtful exploration?)

When leaders default to the first idea, they mistake motion for progress. Strong organizations slow down just long enough to pressure-test assumptions, surface alternatives, and make space for better thinking to emerge. This prompt pushes your team to confront where you’re rushing decisions—and what stronger options you might be leaving on the table.

Ask yourself | As a decision-maker, how do you balance the urgency to act with the discipline to challenge your first idea—especially when others are ready to follow your lead? (What systems or habits help you avoid locking in too early?)

Real World Scenario – Manufacturing
A regional manufacturing firm set out to reduce production delays by introducing a new shift schedule. The initial idea was to add more staff to the night shift, assuming it would balance workloads. After three months, delays persisted—and morale declined.

Instead of sticking with the original plan, leadership initiated a root-cause analysis and engaged frontline workers for feedback. It turned out the issue wasn’t staffing, but bottlenecks in machine maintenance and inconsistent supply deliveries. The third solution—a preventive maintenance rotation paired with vendor scheduling changes—cut delays by 40% within six weeks.

The first idea sounded logical. The best idea came after listening, learning, and letting go of assumptions.

WEEK 3 | Action Step

Come up with three new variations on a current project before finalizing your plan.

🔁 Actionable Strategies

Here are 5 actionable strategies that put Rule No. 6 – Your First Idea Is Rarely Your Best into practice:

1. Require a “Three-Option” Standard for Major Decisions

Never approve a proposal—strategic, financial, or operational—unless the team presents at least three viable alternatives. This forces deeper thinking and prevents defaulting to the first idea that sounds good.


2. Pilot Before You Commit

Run small tests, prototypes, or limited trials before going all-in. A quick pilot exposes weaknesses early and often reveals a stronger version of the idea.


3. Separate Idea Generation from Evaluation

Hold brainstorms where ideas cannot be judged or debated until later. When people know they won’t be shut down immediately, they offer more—and better—alternatives.


4. Use “Assumption Audits” Before Moving Forward

List the assumptions behind the first idea and challenge each one. If the idea relies on too many untested beliefs, it’s a sign you haven’t pushed far enough.


5. Reward Iteration, Not Just Execution

Publicly recognize leaders who revisit and improve ideas—not just those who move fast. When refinement is celebrated, people stop clinging to their first concepts and start improving them.

Rules to Results Workshop: Rule No. 6 – Your First Idea Is Rarely Your Best

Total Time: 45 Minutes

1. Opening & Framing (5 minutes)

  • Brief overview of the rule and why first ideas are often the weakest.
  • One quick example (manufacturing, tech, or leadership misstep).
  • Set the tone: this session is about pushing past comfortable thinking.

2. The “First Idea Trap” Exercise (10 minutes)

Activity:

  • Participants write down a recent initiative where the first idea became the default.
  • In pairs, they identify what assumptions went unchallenged and what alternatives were never explored.

Outcome:
A clear awareness of where teams rush to action rather than pressure-test.


3. Idea Expansion Drill (10 minutes)

Activity:

  • Each group takes one real initiative and forces themselves to generate three alternate options—no matter how rough.
  • Ask: If we couldn’t use the first idea, what would we do instead?
  • Quick share-out.

Outcome:
Leaders see firsthand that better options appear when you refuse to settle.


4. Systems Check: Where We Encourage or Kill Iteration (10 minutes)

Discussion:

  • What in our culture punishes revisiting ideas?
  • Where are we rewarding speed over thinking?
  • What bottlenecks keep us from testing alternatives (time, structure, ego, habit)?

Outcome:
Teams expose the internal habits that keep them stuck on first ideas.


5. Commitment to One Change (5 minutes)

Action Step:
Each leader identifies one specific place where they will enforce a “second-option” rule in the next 30 days—meetings, proposals, product ideas, strategy sessions, anything.

Outcome:
Practical commitment, not theory.


Close (Optional 1 minute)

Reaffirm the rule: Breakthroughs come from the iterations you haven’t explored yet.

WEEK 3 | Recommended Reading

Originals by Adam Grant

“The greatest originals are the ones who fail the most, because they’re the ones who try the most.” — Adam Grant

Key Executive Takeaway

Originals shows that innovation isn’t about having a single lightning-bolt idea—it’s about generating many, challenging your own thinking, and refining until the best solution emerges. The most successful leaders aren’t the ones who act first, but the ones who think differently and persist long enough to get it right.

📘Book Summary

Originals explores how individuals champion new ideas and drive change without waiting for permission or perfect timing. Adam Grant draws on research and real-world examples to reveal that originality isn’t just about creativity—it’s about courage, persistence, and strategic risk-taking. He explains how to recognize good ideas (and weed out bad ones), speak up effectively, build support, and overcome the fear of failure. The book challenges the myth of the lone genius, showing that innovation thrives through iteration, feedback, and a willingness to challenge the status quo.

Business Owner Takeaways

1. Your first idea is almost always the most obvious—strong leaders push past it.

Winners aren’t the ones who grab the first concept; they’re the ones who force themselves to explore alternatives.

2. Quantity leads to quality.

Originals makes it clear: the people who generate the most ideas also land the best ones. Iteration isn’t waste—it’s the process.

3. The fastest decisions are rarely the sharpest.

Rushing to action creates blind spots. The workshop exposes where your organization confuses speed with good thinking.

4. Assumptions must be challenged, not protected.

Breakthrough ideas require questioning the comfortable logic behind your first solution. If you don’t audit assumptions, they own you.

5. Great organizations reward refinement, not just execution.

Cultures that value second and third ideas end up with better strategies, stronger products, and fewer costly course corrections.

How do creative people come up with great ideas? Organizational psychologist Adam Grant studies “originals”: thinkers who dream up new ideas and take action to put them into the world. In this talk, learn three unexpected habits of originals — including embracing failure. “The greatest originals are the ones who fail the most, because they’re the ones who try the most,” Grant says. “You need a lot of bad ideas in order to get a few good ones.”

Subscribe to The Executives Institute YouTube Channel